Argentina, the golden child of the middle income trap

Argentina, a middle-income country in South America, stands out as one of the region's largest economies. With a GDP of approximately USD 631 billion in 2022, it ranks 26th globally in economic size and 59th in economic complexity (OEC, n.d.). Rich in natural resources like lead, zinc, and ore, Argentina has long depended on primary resource trade as a key economic driver. However, repeated political and economic crises have stunted its economic growth, keeping it trapped in a middle-income status. Making it the poster-boy for Latin America’s middle income trap.

Historical Context and Political Instability

Argentina's economic challenges are deeply intertwined with its political history. In the 1930s, the country faced significant instability, culminating in the disruption of its constitution and a series of institutional failures. The election of populist leader Juan Perón marked a period of political turbulence, characterized by electoral fraud and ineffective institutional frameworks that hindered growth (Spruk, 2019). Instead of fostering economic development, the government-backed favoritism and rent-seeking practices prevailed, coupled with inward-industrialization (ISI) strategies that isolated domestic industries from global market pressures (Akhile, 2014).

Economic Setbacks and Crisis Management

The 2000s brought a fleeting sense of economic progress for Latin America, with Argentina and Brazil experiencing temporary increases in real wages and social transfers. However, the 2008 global economic crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of this progress. Government prioritization of short-term political gains over sustainable welfare state development exacerbated financial insecurity (Yeyati, 2021).

Despite these setbacks, Argentina's experience offers valuable insights into its socio-political context and the challenges it faces in implementing effective national development strategies. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending why the nation remains trapped in middle-income status.

Compressed Economies and Development Strategies

Argentina's economic situation aligns with the concept of a compressed economy, which Haggard (2018) describes as "late economic bloomers" requiring significant state involvement in policy implementation to compete globally. Unlike countries like China and India, which had more extended periods to establish institutions, compressed economies like Argentina face the challenge of leveraging developmental tools and technological advances effectively.

Whittaker et al. (2010) highlight that late developers must participate actively in the global value chain (GVC) to thrive. However, Argentina's reliance on outdated development strategies, such as ISI, hinders its ability to generate new value. Whittaker differentiates between "developmental states" and "predatory states." Argentina's historical socio-political environment suggests it operates more as a predatory state, where private interests overshadow collective well-being and bureaucratic capabilities are limited (Whittaker et al., 2010).

Opportunities from Compressed Economies

Argentina's status as a compressed economy presents opportunities to learn from successful late developers like the East Asian Tigers. By adopting strategies such as vertically integrated national industries, import substitution, and export promotion, Argentina could overcome its current economic challenges (Gerschenkron, 1962; Whittaker et al., 2010). However, successful national development strategies depend on the ability to accumulate capital and innovate, which Argentina currently struggles with (Rodrik, 2013).

Corporate Governance and Crony Capitalism

Corporate governance in Argentina is characterized by a Hierarchical Market Economy (HME), marked by family blockholding in large corporations. This has led to a concentration of economic power, with 65% of large corporations controlled by family groups, creating an oligopoly (Quigley & Gomez de la Torre, 2013). High state intervention and reliance on government benevolence force enterprises to engage in crony capitalism, where business success is influenced by political connections rather than market efficiency. This has placed Argentina 11th on the crony-capitalism index and first in institutional weakness (The Economist, 2014; Beker, 2016). Now ranking 135th out of the 179 countries ranked in the The Wall Street Journal/Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom.

The verticalization of power extends to local authorities, where two-thirds of provinces rely on the state as the major employer. This arrangement often results in low productivity, inadequate wages, and capital-labor imbalances (Beker, 2016). The lack of government support for innovation and entrepreneurship has pushed many workers into the informal sector, which now represents nearly 40% of total employment (Beker, 2016).

Labor Market Dynamics and Skills Equilibrium

Argentina's labor market suffers from a "locked-in low-skills equilibrium" a concept presented by Schneider. This framework shows how high job regulation and short job tenures perpetuate a cycle of low skills and low productivity. High labor regulations in an economy with a significant informal sector create costly regulations that discourage long-term employment and investment in employee skills (Schneider, 2021). The informal sector's dominance, combined with frequent layoffs, stabilizes unemployment rates and perpetuates a lack of investment in employee training.

The absence of robust unions and the presence of high rates of multinational corporations exacerbate this issue. Multinationals can poach trained employees from national firms, further discouraging investment in workforce development (Kang, 2021). This results in a damaging feedback loop that impedes economic growth.

Capitalism and Institutional Development

Beker (2016) segments Argentina's capitalist system into two main phases: high state participation with populist and neoliberal intervals from 1945 to 2008, and crony capitalism with populism from 2008 to 2015. The coexistence of capitalism with remnants of pre-capitalist structures, including a significant informal sector, highlights the challenges Argentina faces in escaping the middle-income trap.

Human Capital and Industrial Development

To break free from its current economic constraints, Argentina could benefit from implementing the human capital theory. This approach suggests that aligning educational outcomes with market demands can promote industrialization and economic growth (Green et al., 2007). By adopting policies similar to those in Taiwan and Hong Kong, Argentina could better match educational outputs with industry needs, fostering a more skilled workforce and increasing economic diversification.

Future Prospects and Impact Investment

Despite significant challenges, there is hope for Argentina's economic future. Impact investment in Latin America has surged 12-fold in five years, from $160 million to $2 billion (Impact Investment in Argentina, 2020). The Global Steering Group for Impact Investment aims to strategically invest in Argentina to attract FDI and develop domestic industries.

For Argentina to fully capitalize on these opportunities, it must address the underlying issues of corruption, mismanagement, and institutional weakness. Effective restructuring and strategic investment could pave the way for economic revitalization and sustainable growth.

Argentina's journey through the middle-income trap is shaped by its complex history, economic strategies, and political dynamics. While significant challenges remain, including political instability, crony capitalism, and a lack of investment in human capital, there are also opportunities for growth. By learning from successful late developers and leveraging impact investment, Argentina has the potential to overcome its economic hurdles and achieve sustained development through a commitment to long-term strategic planning.

Sources 

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. A. (2012). Why nations fail. Crown Publishers. http://norayr.am/collections/books/Why-Nations-Fail-Daron-Acemoglu.pdf

Akhile, J. (2014, December 1). Inward-Looking Industrialization "aka" Import-Substitution Industrialization (ISI) - Part Two. Unleash African Trade from https://www.unleashafricantrade.com/2014/12/01/inward-looking-industrialization-aka-import-substitution-industrialization-isi-part-two/

Argentina (ARG) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners | OEC. (n.d.). The Observatory of Economic Complexity from https://oec.world/en/profile/country/arg

Argentina seeks to unlock natural resource potential | Argentina 2018. (n.d.). Oxford Business Group from https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/untapped-possibilities-land-great-diversity-and-culture-argentina-seeks-unlock-potential-its-natural

Beker, V. (2016). Capitalism in Argentina. University of Buenos Aires and University of Belgrano from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292762726_Capitalism_in_Argentina

Carnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002, February). What Does Globalization Mean for Educational Change? A Comparative Approach. Comparative Education review, 46(1), 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44828404_What_Does_Globalization_Mean_for_Educational_Change_A_Comparative_Approach

Fishwick, A. (2014). Beyond and beneath the hierarchical market economy: Global production and working-class conflict in Argentina’s automobile industry. Capital & Class, 38(1), 115–127. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309816813513090

Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective: A book of essays. Belknap Press.

Green, A., Little, A. W., Kamat, S. G., Oketch, M., & Vickers, E. (2007). Education and Development in a Global Era: Strategies for ‘Successful Globalization’. Department for International Development, (69), 256. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/PolicyStrategy/ResearchingtheIssuesNo69.pdf

Haggard, S. (2018). Developmental states. Cambridge University Press.

Hall, A., & Soskice, D. (2003). Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional

Complementarities. Institutional Conflicts and Complementarities, Springer, Boston,

MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4062-2_3

Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, USA.

@HarvardGrwthLab. (n.d.). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/countries/8/export-basket

Impact Investment in Argentina: From "Growth Disaster" to High Growth State? (2020, December 12). Global Research and Consulting Group Insights from https://insights.grcglobalgroup.com/argentina-impact-investment/

Kang, N. (2021). Hierarchical capitalism and “the rise of the rest”. London.

Pavone, C. A., & Watson, R. P. (1999). The Other Argentina: The Interior and National Development by Larry Sawyers. Journal of Third World Studies, 16(1), 273-275. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45193833?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Quigley, J., & Gomez de la Torre, N. (2013). A Primer on Governance of the Family Enterprise. World Economic Forum from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FPC_FamilyEnterpriseGovernance_Report.pdf

Rodrik, D. (2013). Structural Change, Fundamentals, and Growth: An Advanced Overview. Institute for Society. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/structural-change-fundamentals-and-growth-an-overview_revised.pdf

Spruk, R. (2019). The rise and fall of Argentina. Latin American Economic Review, 28(16). https://latinaer.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s40503-019-0076-2.pdf

Whittaker, H., Zhu, T., Sturgeon, T., Han Tsai, M., & Okita, &. T. (2010). Compressed Development. Springer Science+Business Media. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12116-010-9074-8.pdf

Yeyati, E. L. (2021, November 8). Argentina's Warning to Latin America: “I Am You, Tomorrow”. Americas Quarterly from https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/argentinas-warning-to-latin-america-i-am-you-tomorrow/